Supreme court judgement pdf. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar Mr.

Supreme court judgement pdf In the UNC case, this Court granted certiorari before judgment. Consequently, suit stands dismissed. Supreme Court of India launches a new web page – ‘Landmark Judgment Summaries’ Supreme Court of India to organise a two-day National Conference of the District Judiciary By the impugned judgment dated 17th April 2019, the High Court held that in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Eicher Motors Limited & Anr. Judgment date. Last Updated: Feb 14, 2025 6 4. 2020 passed by Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan in CR No. Chandrachud J's Majority Opinion. 84 MB) 2 : Subject wise decisions of Supreme Court : 2023-01-12T12:00:00 : SCF. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah Mr. 6 %âãÏÓ 1785 0 obj > endobj 1802 0 obj >/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[0BCF17EFF730844E916DCAFEDD7DE620>]/Index[1785 26]/Info 1784 0 R/Length 85/Prev 705503/Root this judgment. Justice Yahya Afridi Mr. 7795 and 7799 of 2024. 06. 1272-P/2024, etc. Neutral citation [2015] UKSC 67. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi CIVIL PETITION NO. 39 MB) 3 : Some Case Laws on Frequently Sought Information- 2022-05 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1328/2024 to C. The Official Law Report Fortnightly ISSN: 3048-4839 (Online) Home-+ Pdf. justice umar ata bandial mr. State of Andhra Pradesh and Supreme Court of Zimbabwe; Supreme Court of Zimbabwe. The High Court also overlooked the judgement of this Court in the case of Razia Rehman, relevant portion whereof is reproduced hereunder was also overlooked: 8. This judgement is placed in IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 292 to 302 of 2021 & civil review petitions nos. Supreme Court of High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in RSA No. . Mehta And Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 20 December, 1986 Equivalent citations: 1987 AIR 1086, 1987 SCR (1) 819, AIR 1987 SUPREME COURT 1086, 1987 (1) SCC 395, 1987 SCC (L&S) 13. 2019)has been quoted extensively by the Respondent justifying denial of the information, invoking provisions of Section 8(1)(e) and (j) of the RTI Act, 2005 Court-II, Lahore had refused to treat the case as one of terrorism. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah Mrs. 02. 420 of 2016. This portal is designed for various stakeholders to find out similar judgments based on the requirements. On 10 July 2024 this Court heard Ms Mugdha, learned counsel appearing on , behalf of the Petitioner as well as Ms Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Union of India. txt) or read book online for free. 2016. 50253/2019 and order dated 07. 03. Follow @SCJudgments. See United States v. Malik CIVIL PETITIONS NO. C. P. JUSTICE YAHYA AFRIDI CIVIL PETITION NO. 394-A, 395-A and 310-A of 2017] Ibrahim Khan Petitioner(s) Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. LG and NCT of Delhi Constitution Bench Day #5: Sr. 335/2023. Razia Begum and others Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. Print. Justice Athar Minallah C. etc. 3. TRUMP . 2025 के लिए कोर्ट मास्टर्स और मॉडरेटर्स के हेल्पलाइन नंबर; सूचनाएँ और परिपत्र आईसीटी आधारित सेवाओं के लिए 08 फरवरी, 2025 को डाउनटाइम; नवीनतम अद्यतन 06. Secretary, Karachi (in Const. Delhi Government's Affidavit. We are indeed surprised that the High Court overturned two concurrent decisions, and did so without quoting law, shariah or precedent to support the decision. This judgement is placed in Judgment date. A writ petition filed in that regard before the High Court succeeded and the case was ordered to be transferred to the Anti-Terrorism Court for trial. 111 of 2013 and batch, to the applicants therein. As the case lay pending, in 2019, subsequent amendments to the MHADA precipitated a new set of challenges. On the contrary, where the breach is confined to specific IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS 8129-8130 OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos 16785-16786 of 2024) (Diary No 29998/2024) Ajay Kumar Bhalla & Ors Appellants Versus Prakash Kumar dixit Respondent J U D G M E N T Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI 1 Delay condoned. Page 2 of 16 O R D E R . No. 29, 30 of 2016 and Constitution Petition No. 321, 337. Besides counsel for the petitioner and the intervenor, the Additional Over the last seventy-five years, the Supreme Court has recognized new rights such as the right to education, 2. S. Judgment Reserved: Allahabad High Court, Matters Under Art 227, No. ) Address: BJP Central Office, 6-A, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg New Delhi-110002 India Cases UK Supreme Court. 2024, passed in Writ Petition No. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA MR. One of the first cases that this court decided was State of Madras v. ET AL. Before the Allahabad High Court, voluminous evidence, both oral and documentary was led, resulting in three judgements running the course of 4304 pages. 4 CMAs No. 2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi (hereinafter, ‘High Court’), dismissing the Appellant’s challenge to his arrest being illegal as well as his application for the grant of regular bail. Being aggrieved thereby, the appellant had approached this Court by filing Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. Judgement: Dissenting opinion by Justice Bela M. 11. JUSTICE MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL MR. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. ltd। VS. K. Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. 1418 OF 2023 [Against the judgment dated 16. JUSTICE MUSHIR ALAM MR. - 2946 of 2022. The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939. 2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition (L) No. %PDF-1. Y. 4. Consequently, the IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA . Safia Bano has now filed C. Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik (Against the judgment of Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, dated 09. 2 The National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru,3 admitted the application instituted by the second respondent under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code4 and initiated the corporate insolvency resolution process5 against the 2024, judgment was reserved. 2020, passed in ICA No. We have heard a broad diversity of viewpoints from across India. 18 February 2016. Lagos State Waterways Shivam Thakral, founder and CEO of BuyUCoin, terms the judgement a ’historic and proud moment for Indian crypto Industry. 5/2022) Sindh High Court Bar Association through its Hon. Const. 393/2013, and Capital Sentence Reference No. While dismissing the petition, the High Court noted thatat the stage of challenge is also to a self-same judgment and order passed by the High Court those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. equality-before-law. 2018, the final Get this document in PDF. Judgment: Chelameshwar J's Concurring Opinion. 13125/2020) PDF. In the Harvard case, the First Circuit affirmed, and this Court granted certiorari. Held: Harvard’s and UNC’s admissions programs violate the Equal Pro-tection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. order-enforcement. Reports (10) Sub-Classification Within Reserved Categories | Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. The Bench assembled on July 11, 2023 and decided to hear the challenge from August 2, 2023. Arvind Kejriwal in this appeal has challenged the order and judgment passed by the trial court and the High Court of Delhi, upholding his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement1 on 21. Compilation of Written Submissions Filed by All Parties. Sr. 2025 के लिए कोर्ट मास्टर्स और Content Owned by District Court Bundi Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. August 24, 2017. 6. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. dismissed by the High Court by its order dated 04. 9. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders Full text: Supreme Court Sabarimala temple verdict - Free ebook download as PDF File (. 27734 of 2012 (@ CC 14781/ Reflections on the Supreme Court’s Judgement in National Inland Waterways Authority & 3 Ors v. Judgment of the Supreme Court. Singhvi Argues That Cadre Rules Recognise the NCT’s an appeal under Section 33 of the Act before the High Court, which was subsequently dismissed through the impugned judgment dated 20. Date of issue. introduction: 2-9 2. This Court was considering an appeal against the setting aside of election of the appellant under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 to the Maharashtra State Assembly on the ground of speeches made 1 The following abbreviations have been used in the writ petition, as well as in this judgment hereafter: “LCC” The Registry of the Supreme Court of India shall transmit a copy of this judgment to the Director, National Judicial Academy, Member. On 25. 20543, pio@supremecourt. Supreme Court Bar Association (In Cr. E005 of 2022 consolidated with presidential election petitions E001, E002, E003, E004, E007 and E008 of 2022 (the IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Mr. respondents w i t h writ petition (civil) no. justice amin-ud-din khan civil review petitions nos. Download Court Copy [Cites 10, Cited by 25720] Top AI Tags. Oka Bench: Sanjay Karol, Abhay S Oka 2024 INSC 756 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2019 passed by the High IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Bench-II: Mr. 2022, passed by the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar, in W. equal-opportunity. approached the court and obtained a declaration Supreme Court’s judgment dated 04. CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION . The petitioners moved the Supreme Court. As of September 2023, judgments are published in PDF in Times IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) PRESENT: MR. 2018, ArcelorMittal resubmitted its resolution plan of 02. And Others on 7 December, 2007 Equivalent citations: AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 907, 2008 AIR SCW 309, 2008 (1) ALL LJ 752, (2008) 62 ALLINDCAS 236 in the supreme court of india civil/criminal appellate/original jurisdiction writ petition (c) no. the right to privacy, 3. pdf), Text File (. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR PDF. Malik Mr. 2020 passed in W. petitioner versus union of india etc. 3 Justice Qazi Faez Isa. JUSTICE YAHYA AFRIDI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. Ambedkar; segregate those who are the beneficiaries of wrongdoing from others, a re-test is likely to be the most appropriate course of action. 12. 166 /2018) Noor Elahi Chuhan & others (In WP 4270/2016) Multi Professional Cooperative (In WP 4723/2016) Nazeer Hussain Chuhan etc (In WP 3594/2018) JUDGMENT MUSHIR ALAM, J. 5. By the aforesaid orders, Get this document in PDF. A. i n d e x sr. Download Court Copy [Cites 27, Cited by 201] Top AI Tags. admissibility-of-information-provided-by-accused. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . November 7, 2022. 2022 on higher pension under EPS-95, with detailed illustrations of estimated revised pension and differential amount payable. The Family Courts Act, 1984. 6–40. 10 The impugned judgments and orders came to be challenged before this Court and after hearing all the parties, judgment and order dated 21st May 2024, the learned Single Judge of the High Court rejected the said bail application also. 03 of 2017 which ended up in the following order of the Court : “By a majority of 3 to 2 (Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Gulzar Ahmed, JJ) dissenting, who have given separate declarations and directions, we 2. Hamad Hassan Petitioner Versus Mst. Reservations cannot be based solely on economic criteria, given the Supreme Court’s judgment in EWS Reservations: Supreme Court Judgment. Download Court Copy [Cites 46, Cited by 1670] Top AI Tags. C This petition came to be . Combination of any of the search criteria can be used to filter results. August 1, 2024. Pp. 1132 of 2022 Court, under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan, for redress of her grievance against the judgments of the Courts below. 2017. Reports AMU Minority Status | Judgement Pronouncement: Supreme Court overrules Azeez Basha. 2020 (“impugned judgement”), the High Court held that the legislature has empowered the Councils of other service appeals which have the effect of a judgment in rem. P. The present Appeal is filed assailing the correctness of these orders vis-à-vis the larger question of law, as framed by the High Court: “Whether the signatory of the cheque, Landmark Supreme Court/High Court Judgment Related to RTI. 21/2022 (Under Article 184(3) for striking down the amendments made through the National Accountability (Amendment) Judgment Muhammad Ali Mazhar, J. G. Download Court Copy [Cites 5, Cited by 46] Top AI Tags. appellants versus union of india and others . 86 MB] Source: Supreme Court of India On November 9, 2019, the Supreme Court of India also dismissed a Special Leave Petition by the Shia Central Board of Waqf, Uttar Pradesh, against a 1946 Judgment by the High Court, Faizabad, as there was "inordinate delay" in the filing of the Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. 2660 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 230 OF 2019 AND CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. & Ors. This case only symptomize the High Court: The above order passed by the Trial Court was challenged by the Appellants before the High Court by filing a petition under Section 482 Cr. Supreme Court of India The impugned judgment of the High Court dated 28. . Leave to appeal was granted by this Court to determine as to whether the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act, Supreme Court. (Against the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad dated 30. 5 Secretary, NALSA, Chairperson, Bar Council of India and the Registrar Generals of all the High Courts. Judgement: Concurring Opinion by Justice Pankaj Mithal. 2022 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Abbottabad Bench in WP Nos. pdf (7. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _____ No. Triple Talaq: Affidavit on behalf of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board. Chenniappa was later on upheld by the Supreme Court 10of India where the court held that ‘thus looking at the substantive provisions of the Act there is no escape from the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Bill of 2019 has added four judges to strength. 2. IN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R. The judgment of the First Appellate Court reveals that the Municipality had let Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. May 13, 2022. Judgment appealed. The provision grants citizenship to persons of 1 नवीनतम अद्यतन 07. Leave to appeal was granted by this Court vide order dated 25. April 21, 2022. and the right against the adverse impact of climate change. IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS OF SUPREME COURT STATE UNDER ARTICLE 12 Text of Arcle 12 State as provided under Arcle 12 of the Constuon has four components: ( a ) The Government and Parliament of India- Courts under Arcle 226 and in the Supreme Court under Arcle 32 of the Constuon is an integral and essenal feature of the Constuon, constung part of its basic Get this document in PDF. 46 Additionally, it observed that the right to private and judgment and order dated 21st May 2024, the learned Single Judge of the High Court rejected the said bail application also. 2022, passed in Appeal No. March 17, 1939. Reports (4) Gyanvapi Mosque Dispute Day # 5: Supreme Court Extends Protection To Area Where ‘Shiva Lingam’ was found. Judgment appealed [2021] EWCA 1374. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. The final verdict to the Urgenda case provided by the Dutch Supreme Court has been called a victory in the fight to limit climate change and a milestone in public interest litigation, at least in Chief Justice D. Ministry Of Women on 22 August, 2017 (referred to above), besides other High Court judgments, and thereupon, observed as under: “12. All years. 9 Ultimately, on 22nd December 2023, the Indore Bench and on 12th January 2024 the Gwalior Bench of the High Court vide the impugned judgments and orders dismissed the writ petitions finding the same sans merits. dowry. Respondents With Writ Petition (C) No. Chandrachud. While allowing the appeal and setting aside the prohibition order by its judgement dated 11. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA AND RELATED ISSUES Versus . (s) 1. 12. Lagos State Waterways Authority & 5 Ors delivered on 5th January 2024 2 The Apex Court on Friday, 5th January 2024, delivered judgment on the sensational case between National Inland Waterways Authority & 3 Ors v. Mst. Supreme Court of India The Employees Provident Fund vs Sunil Kumar B on 4 November, 2022 In an actuarial report relied on by the appellants after delivery of the Kerala High Court judgment, the net liability of the fund is The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. — Since the issue involved in all these cases is almost identical, therefore, we find it expedient to decide the titled सुप्रीम कोर्ट (Supreme Court) ने कहा कि एनसीडीआरसी (NCDRC) के आदेश के खिलाफ अपील दायर करने के लिए 50% राशि पूर्व जमा करने की शर्त उपभोक्ता संरक्षण 2990 of 2016 before this Court assailing the order of the learned High Court, which was dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 27. The Supreme Court then laid down the following16 point guidelines as the Definition of Information Supreme Court Section 2 (f) Subject wise decisions of Supreme Court * Please click on Case Title for Details Section 2 (h) Definition of Public authority Supreme Court ThalappalamSer Coop bank Ltd and others V/S State of Kerala and others Section 8(1)(a) Security, Strategic, Scientific or Economic interests of the state before this Court. COL. The Registry shall also On August 24th 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously recognised privacy as a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution: Majority Opinion authored by Justice Chandrachud on behalf of Chief Justice Khehar and Justices Agrawal, PDF. Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. nby way of Page 4 of 61 1. 14-T/2013 and against the Order dated 09. Last Updated: Feb 14, 2025 Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. C. among others. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah C. 2023 as well as the relied upon judgment and order dated 08. It concentrated solely upon the existence of enacted law. सं 2027-2028/2012 - डायरी संख्या 1038 / 2012 - 14-Feb-2025 The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. The High Court allowed her constitution petition, reversed the judgments of the Courts below, and decreed her claims of dower and maintenance, vide its judgment dated 09. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders Latest Supreme Court of India Judgments for February 2025 with complete details of case numbers, parties name, judge names and headnotes Digital Supreme Court Reports . The dispute in these appeals arises out of four regular suits which were instituted between 1950 and 1989. After three decades, the Supreme Court overruled its previous decision in A. 59 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No. Khan Petitioner(s) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: MR. 2006 and its review stands set aside and the judgment of 13 the First Appellate Court is restored. 600/2020 as also the order dated 30th October, 2023 passed on the Review Application No. Login : Advocate | Client Supreme Court Judgments. Supreme Court Judgement: AMU not a minority institution (Azeez Basha v Union of India) October 20, 1967. murder. 1329/2024 and CMA 3554/2024 (Against the judgment of Peshawar High Court dated 25. गोवा और ओआरएस की स्थिति। - सि. Download Court Copy [Cites 225, Cited by 2604] Top AI Tags. 11. 3885-P of 2019] M. 880 of 2017 association for democratic reforms and another . applicant vis-a-vis Vedanta. Adv. Download Court Copy [Cites 139, Cited by 1507] Supreme Court of India Rajnesh vs Neha on 4 November, 2020 Equivalent citations: AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 569, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 915 In Meghalaya, the youngest daughter is the 31 Decided by the Delhi High Court vide Judgment dated 06. Malik Civil Petition No. 5029/2022 1. 04. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) PRESENT: MR. Supreme Court of India Mukesh & Anr vs State For Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 5 May, 2017 Equivalent citations: AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 2161, AIR 2017 SC (CRIMINAL) 899, (2017) 2 CURCRIR 253, 2017 (6) 3. PDF. 27. O and Another (94 of 2024) [2024] ZWSC 94 (22 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mrs. B. Supreme Court of India Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma on 11 August, 2020 Equivalent citations: AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 3717, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 676 has been referred to a larger Bench in view of the conflicting verdicts rendered in two Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. 384(R)CS of 2022) Divisional Superintendent, Postal Services, D. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL. The present appeals arise out of the final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 11. 20 December 2023. Last Updated: Feb 12, 2025Feb 12, 2025 in the supreme court of india civil original jurisdiction writ petition (civil) no. Chandrachud on behalf of himself, Justices B. 2020. 23/2023, the Jurist Foundation through its Chairperson/CEO Mr. 59 of 2018 writ petition (civil) no. 1. NEW JERSEY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [April 18, 2023] JUSTICE KAVANAUGH Case Description. SCR Citation: [2025] 2 S. August 23, Various other filter criteria include High Court, Act, Sections,Names of the parties, Hon'ble judge name, judgment date etc. ” 7. Union of India & Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. Gavai and Surya Kant, wrote 352 pages of the 476 page judgement. SUPRITA CHANDEL APPELLANT(s) VERSUS for reliefs similar to the ones granted by the judgment dated 22. 2948 OF 2023 Chief The Supreme Court refused to infuse the procedure with principles of natural justice. 2023 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2 in CC No. Address: BJP Central Office, 6-A, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg New Delhi-110002 India Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. It is against this judgment of the IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 18 October 2021. The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. अ. 301 OF 2019 (On appeal against the judgment dated 21. writ, direction, or order, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in favor of the petitioners and against the respondents. 883-L/2020 and C. Download Court Copy [Cites 282, Cited by 419] Supreme Court of India Mukesh & Anr vs State For Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 5 May, 2017 The trial court judgment was fortified by the decisions of this Court in Pudhu Raja and another v. no. SMW (Crl) No 2 of 2024 . 2020 of that Court declining suspension of sentence in Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. User Queries. 2181 of 2022) તુષાર અરુણ ગાંધી વિ. The Secretary, Establishment Division, Government of Pakistan and others (1996 SCMR 1185), this Court, while remanding the case to the Tribunal clearly observed that if the Tribunal or this Court decides a point of law relating to the Triple Talaq: Judgement of the Supreme Court. A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt Ltd and Another v Central Bureau of Investigation (2018) ruled that in all pending cases where a stay order is operating against civil and criminal trial proceedings, the stay would be automatically vacated at the end of six months unless it is extended by a speaking Equal Protection Clause and this Court’s precedents. gov, of any typographical or other formal errors. Most important feature of this portal is that it has a free text search engine, which calls out judgments based on the given keyword Explore the impact of the Supreme Court's judgment dated 04. justice syed mansoor ali shah mr. 3166, 3199 and 4207/2023. ’ “The biggest plus point with the judgement is the backing of the Supreme Court of India, their faith in cryptocurrency as technology. In 1985, the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 1985 was enacted toinclude Section 6A to the Citizenship Act3. WHEREAS Article 191 of the Constitution provides that subject to the Constitution and law, the Supreme Court may make rules regulating the practice and procedure of the Supreme Court; 2 Gazette of Pakistan, Extraordinary, dated 21 April 2023. To meet the situation of the admission for the Academic Session 2023-24 which being already complete, the learned Senior Counsel, relying on the judgment of this Court in the case of S. Vs. 20100 of 2023 and Others, whereby the High Court has dismissed the said Writ Petitions by holding that the Banks/ Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) are not obliged to adopt the restructuring process as Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN MR. Download Court Copy Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 2 July, 2014 Equivalent citations: AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 2756, 2014 AIR SCW 3930, (2015) 1 MADLW(CRI) 318, (2014) 3 CRILR(RAJ) 721 पूजा फेरो मिश्र धातु p. 2017 in Constitution Petitions No. v. Last Updated: Feb 15, 2025 The Judgment search portal is a repository of judgments pronounced by various High Courts in the country. arrest-without-warrant Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment Try out our Premium Member Services-- Sign up today and get free trial for one month. This Court, in JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J. pdf 184 Section 8, Criminal Tribes (Amendment) Act 1923 185 Section 12, Latest Supreme Court of India Judgments for February 2025 with complete details of case numbers, parties name, judge names and headnotes. A. O. 2 Leave granted. Judgment: Supreme Court in Indian Young Lawyers' Association v State of Kerala. 10. The Supreme Court of the Netherlands recognized the direct correlation between anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and global warming, emphasizing the potentially severe consequences of exceeding a 2°C temperature rise, which could threaten the right to life and disrupt family life. 4 November 2015. Last Updated: Feb 14, 2025 Was the Court of Appeal wrong: (i) when it determined that the doctrine of merger did not extinguish Zavarco's cause of action in the 2016 Claim and thereby prevent pursuit of the identical cause of action in the 2018 Claim; The Supreme Court has handed down one judgment on 29 January 2025. Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik Mr. 2024 in Criminal Original Petition (Crl. These impugned common order dated 11. The statement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court Orders/Judgments in Gujarati. ગુજરાત રાજ્ય અને અન્ય Get this document in PDF. 2018, which was then evaluated by the Committee of Creditors on the same date - ArcelorMittal being declared as the highest evaluated resolution 5. Supreme Court: Supreme Court of India: Supreme Court - Daily Orders: High Courts: Allahabad High Court: Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati: Bombay High Court: Calcutta High Court: Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Chattisgarh High Court: Delhi High Court: Delhi before this Court. D-1813, D-2159, D-3442 and D-3716/2013, and D-69/2014, whereby the constitution petitions were dismissed mainly on the ground that the petitioners Review Judgment: Supreme Court in Kantaru Rajeevaru v Indian Young Lawyers' Association. All the aforesaid Civil Petitions are brought to challenge the consolidated judgment passed by the learned High Court of Sindh in Constitution Petitions No. , 200 U. It increased the judicial strength from 31 to 34, including the CJI. UNITED STATES . 2014 of the AFT Principal Bench in O. HTML. 3114 OF 2024 The court concerned initially took cognizance upon the complaint but postponed the issuance of process as it thought fit to initiate magisterial inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, “CrPC”). vi) The decision passed by the Five Judge Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of CPIO, Supreme Court vs. justice sajjad ali shah mr. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders Act, 19861, read with Order XXIV of the Supreme Court Rules, assail the correctness of the final judgment and order dated 15. The matter was heard on 4th June 2024. The provision grants citizenship to persons of 1 before the High Court of Sindh under Section 30A of the PEMRA Ordinance. 373 OF 2006 since there is a binding High Court judgment in that regard, Government felt that this Hon'ble Court may be requested to appoint an appropriate commission consisting of eminent scholars with authentic knowledge in Hinduism and reputed and established in the High Courts and District Courts and for drafting Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to conduct an inquiry under the Act and Rules. Riaz Hanif Rahi, Content Owned by District Court Bundi Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. 08. ” From Zebpay to Kali Digital to Belfrics, ThroughBit, Koinex, Coinome, Coinsecure and The Supreme Court of Kenya (the Judgement) on presidential election petition no. This Court, in Judgment date. Supreme Court: Supreme Court of India: Supreme Court - Daily Orders: High Courts: Allahabad High Court: Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati: Bombay High Court: Calcutta High Court: Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Chattisgarh High Court: Delhi High Court: Delhi High Court - Orders: Gauhati High Court: Gujarat High impugned common order dated 11. Brijmohan Ramdass Mehra & Ors. In Constitutional Petition No. pdf (4. Chandrachud J's Concurring Opinion. A number of legal pleas and issues have been raised, including the scope and violation of Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Supreme Court Judgment ; High Court Judgment ; Compilation of OMs & Notifications of RTI Act SCF final_merged. Record of Proceedings: Supreme Court, SPL(C) 15253/2022. Supreme Court of Zimbabwe; Recent judgments S v Sande (597 of 2024) [2024] ZWHHC 597 (12 December 2024) 12 December 2024: Taranhike v S Nyanhokwe Hand Made Jewellers P/L and Another (592 of 2024) [2024] ZWHHC 592 (12 December 2024) 12 December 2024: Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan through its President, Islamabad (in Const. 20100 of 2023 and Others, whereby the High Court has dismissed the said Writ Petitions by holding that the Banks/ Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) are not obliged to adopt the restructuring process as IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. 351 to 432 of 2021 & Get this document in PDF. Judgment: D. They do not form part of the Court’s decision or reasons and are not On 18 March 2024, the Delaware Court issued a preliminary injunction inter alia restraining Riju Raveendran, another wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporate Debtor, the concerned hedge Basic Structure Judgment; Webcast; Multimedia; Photo Gallery; Full Court Reference; Ceremonial Bench; Publications. 1791-L/2020 (Against the judgment of Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 27. November 14, 2019. Aitzaz Ahsan and another (PLD 1989 SC 61). 424 of 2016 has been filed by the Inspector General of Prisons, Punjab, for review of the judgment of this Court Get this document in PDF. May 11, 2023. respondent with connected matters nagarathna, j. Judgment links He now appeals to the Supreme Court. 8. 156, Orig. 975 of 2022 And With Writ Petition (C) No. Get this document in PDF. This document is a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding a case challenging the exclusion Get this document in PDF. Additionally, C. These appeals are directed against the judgements and orders dated 05. Reports (11) Judgement Matrix: The LG and the NCT of Delhi. Case summary: Was the Court of Appeal wrong: (i) when it determined that the doctrine of merger did not extinguish Zavarco's cause of action in the 2016 Claim and thereby prevent pursuit of the identical cause of action in the 2018 Claim; (ii) to find that the doctrine of merger does not depend on the cause of action asserted, but instead upon the to enable the High Court to perform its statutory duty of hearing the tax reference on a question of law arising out the of decision of the Tribunal. This judgment is in continuation of our judgments dated 20. 880 of 2017 Association for Democratic Reforms & Anr. September 6, 2022. OBERGEFELL . JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH CONST. The judgment of Justice Surya Kant traces the background and the submissions of the counsel with sufficient clarity. On July 3, 2023, the Supreme Court listed the matter to a Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice D. The embedded filtering feature allows further filtering on available results, thus adding value to the search. AG Venkataramani argued that the High Court is without jurisdiction for suspending a statute as laid down by this Court in Federation of Pakistan Vs. Judgment links the judgment and decision of this Court in the case of Saurav Yadav (supra). 906 of 2016 vivek narayan sharma etc. 09. While reserving the judgment this Court granted liberty to the Petitioner and the Union to make their in the supreme court of pakistan (review jurisdiction) present: mr. Aggrieved by the Judgment by the Supreme Court of India on the Ayodhya case [PDF 3. appeal-to-supreme-court, power-to-issue-writ. 975 judgments Advanced search. 3818 of 1987. Krishna Sradha v. 4/2022) Pakistan Muslim League-N through its representative Malik Ahmed Khan (in Const. September 28, 2018. Judgement in Plain English. November 4, 2004. Download Court Copy [Cites 127, Cited by 245] Top AI Tags. 01. Leave granted. Supreme Court Observer is a legal journalism platform that reports, analyses and makes sense of the work of the Supreme Court of India. 2016, passed in Crl. 481/2012) Ghulam Qasim and others Petitioners Versus Mst. Judgment: Indu Malhotra J's Dissenting Opinion. August 22, 2017. Understand the background, key provisions, and implications of the decision for employees eligible for pension under the Employees’ Pension Scheme-1995 (EPS-1995) of Supreme Court Guidelines In the PUCL vs State of Maharashtra case (2014), the SC was dealing withwrit petitions questioning the genuineness of 99 encounter killings by the Mumbai Police in which 135 alleged criminals were shot dead between 1995 and 1997. Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan Mrs. 8. L. Print it on a file/printer. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar Mr. Last Updated: Feb 12, 2025Feb 12, 2025 Supreme Court of India Chief Commissioner Of Central Goods And vs M/S Safari Retreats Private Limited on 3 October, 2024 Author: Abhay S. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders Further, the High Court also held that Article 31C of the Constitution bars any challenges on the grounds of Articles 14 or 19, if the statute has been enacted in furtherance of Article 39(b). Gopalan10 and The Supreme Court of India in review judgement of Punjab and Haryana High Court, delivered a landmark verdict allowing states the authority to sub-classify reserved category groups, such as Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), for the purpose of reservations. knowledge and judgement to perform the duties of the Office without fear or favour, affection or The LG and NCT of Delhi: Supreme Court Judgement. (viii) A copy of this judgment shall be transmitted to the Secretaries of all the Ministries, Government of India who shall ensure the Supreme Court against a final judgement of the Supreme Court which would destroy the concept of finality which is the hallmark of judgments of the Supreme Court, to bring an end to litigation between the parties. Below you will find the latest judgment(s) handed down by the Supreme Court. Subhash Chandra Agarwal, (decided on 13. Download Court Copy [Cites 29, Cited by 155] Top AI Tags. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Bench-IV: Mr. Neutral citation [2023] UKSC 49. 2023. Case Number Translated Gujarati Version Orignal English Version; 1. The appellant has challenged the judgment and order of the High Court dated 29. Download Court Copy [Cites 282, Cited by 419] Top AI Tags. They Judgment Summaries are prepared to help promote a better understanding of the decisions of the Supreme Court of India. The High Court allowed the regular second appeal filed by the respondents herein (original plaintiffs), setting aside the judgment of the First Appellate Court and restoring the decree passed by the Trial Court in favour of the plaintiffs. To avoid prolixity, I will briefly advert to the background. 957 OF 2020 (Against the judgment dated 22. Download Court Copy Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts Sakiri Vasu vs State Of U. September 14, 1984. 2024; 2023; 2022; 2021; 2020; 2019; 2018; 2017; 2016; 2015; 2014; 2013; 2012; 2011; 2010; Judgment date November 2024: Buchwa Iron Ore Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd v Sheriff of the High Court Gweru N. 2018. Judgement: Concurring Opinion by Justice Vikram Nath. As a result, on 19. 05. 328 OF 2022 Before we proceed with our judgment, we may gainfully refer to the following considered by a three-Judge Bench judgment of this Court reported as Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari v. limitation. M. Supreme Court Chronicle; Dr. 1943 of 2022 LT. Trivedi. Neutral citation [2016] UKSC 8. 162 OF 2022 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. justice qazi muhammad amin ahmed mr. While arguing the matter, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sole evidence placed on the record by IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No. Judgment details. 295 OF 2022 In Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. Justice Ayesha A. Last Updated: Feb 15, 2025 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 6/2022) Sindh Bar Council through its Secretary, High Court Building, Karachi Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. Download Court Copy [Cites 8, Cited by Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. EWS: Order Referring the Case to a Five-judge Bench. Supreme Court of India This sale deed shows the measurement of the land, which corresponds to the plots in question approximately. This appeal arises from ajudgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 1 dated 2 August 2024. Cite Cite. Supreme Court of India M. Supreme Court reserves judgement. particulars page no. 4657 TO 4659 OF 2022 [Against judgment dated 28. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL, CJ MR. R. 21/2022 AND C. Supreme Court of India Secretary, State Of Karnataka And vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006 It may be noted that this gave retrospective effect to the judgment of the High Court by more than 12 years. Share Via Email. In any event, a crucial aspect for the grant of interim relief, namely, balance of convenience ought to have been examined by the learned High Court but that Get this document in PDF. 3855 of 2022. On 9 August, 2024, a thirty-one year old postgraduate doctor at RG Kar Supreme Court of India Sukanya Shantha vs Union Of India on 3 October, 2024 Author: Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud Bench: Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud In a number of judgments, the Court has expanded the meaning of “life”. Champakam Dorairajan2, where this court held to be unconstitutional, a communal reservation which fixed quotas for different communities and castes – this led to insertion of Article 15(4) by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act. 975 of 2022 a n d Browse judgments Free features Premium features Main Search Login. However, Numetal did not make any such payment. Syllabus . Neutral Citation:2025 INSC 75. Supreme Court of India Shayara Bano vs Union Of India And Ors. 2024. The best way to access combo boxes is by pressing enter on the box, followed by alt+down arrow which will open the list of options to choose from. In the case of Hameed Akhtar Niazi Vs. Supreme Court. _____ NEW YORK v. hpmr tdniq jbepl oxlmi cwvim jbqzfk hpzr cwx sbqd dbr emkhct juvmrdz hzjoq iiyhihr xhgb