Fuji xh1 low light performance reddit X-H1 has a comfortable larger grip and the small LCD info screen on top. Compare that to the Sony A7 III which measures 127x96x73. 4 is quick and sure-footed. Is buying XH-1, because it is so cheap now, and then - Reddit true Oct 23, 2018 · The XH1 is simply the best Fuji. 4 is Fuji’s best lens because it focuses so closely, a lot of people will say the XF90 is the sharpest lens you can buy for a Fuji system, and that the 56 f/1. 2 FF in terms of dof and low light performance. Im wanting to do mainly architectural, automotive and landscapes in varying lighting scenarios with maybe one or two gigs as well down the line and I'm just wondering whether the X-H2S is the better option as I don't want to be left wanting in low light. The Nikon Z5 features a full-frame sensor, which typically offers better low-light performance and a shallower depth of field compared to APS-C sensors like the one in the Fujifilm X-T5. IBIS isn’t the only aspect of the Fujifilm X-H1 that sets it apart. Yes, more cropping space and on the best lenses considerably sharper than the previous sensor. The short of it: stick with the X-H1, spend the extra you'd spend on the X-T4 to get the 16-55. 8 on a Sony. You might be able to find one cheaper out there, but you lose the benefit of buying from a store and have to deal with some random person. Still, software works miracles these days so almost any image can look like it was shot at 400 ISO. It boosts performance, adds more video recording time, and gives you a headphone jack. It’s a a specialist type of photography and you need really good low light performance and the extra stops of light. XT1 failed horribly. As for which specific lens, you will get the best low-light performance out of the f1. 4 will be harder to nail wide open, but the effect you get with an even shallower depth of field is pleasing. The lock button isn’t pressed and when I turn the ISO dial nothing happens. The generational gap between the sensors in your respective bodies is not insignificant either - especially since the X-T4 got the raft of AF updates. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! The Fuji's AF is very good. I don't get it, it's not for me. And you're done. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! In addition to this extreme low-light ISO sensitivity, the Nikon Zf has the ability to auto-focus in -10EV low-light (with a f/1. Unlike other APSC cameras, Fujis tend to develop a more pleasing noise pattern at high ISO's, more akin to film, which I'm actually quite fond of. Love it for the image quality and size, but hate it for the build quality and low light performance. Those then appeared in the X-T4. Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. I'm planning a trip to Osaka this holiday and I'm leaning more towards the XH1 for its IBIS to pair with a 16-55, good for shooting low light hand held when travelling so I won't have to rely on my tripod that much. Oct 17, 2023 · The AF on the X-H1 was never one of its strong suits - I’d say the low light environment just exacerbated the issue. 2 struggles in low light on the xh1 but work fine on the xt3 but fine for portraits low light street photography etc. The first thing you need to understand is aperture equivalence. I’m in need of some serious help with my XH1. If your priority is low light shooting, then maybe Nikon or Sony are your best bets. I do miss the RF 35 1. 314 votes, 24 comments. However, the f2 versions will still give you decent low-light performance, and they are cheaper, weather sealed and still very good. Thats not to say you cant get solid low light performance with fuji but full frame is a bit easier to get a good low light shot. I started with the Fuji 35f2 because I like the primes :) I own the x t3 and the x pro 2. 4 lenses for low light shooting that will be way smaller and easier to travel with compared to the Sony FF equivalents. Can always use a hotshoe flash, 1. 8 though, that thing was a beast in low light for it's size. but xh1 did a good enough job( i wont shoot in such dark room anyway) no more upgrades for meat least until the xh1 And should you go with a lens like the Fuji XF 35mm f2, your setup will be incredibly small and still produce pro level image quality. Their cameras are as large and heavy as full frame cameras, and their lenses cost an arm and a leg, yet it's an ASPC system. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Fuji has a lut that converts flog to eterna. 4 and XF18 f/1. My questions that I can't seem to get from YouTube or reviews are: Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. Set ISO to auto. Ah, there it is. The APS Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. They have slightly more bokeh and low-light performance, but are significantly larger and MUCH more expensive overall, as a system. 7mm at its thinnest point) and weighs 650g including battery. 8. A f/2. The biggest upgrade will be in AF performance, which I find to be significantly better, specially in low-light and tracking. but when faster a/f is needed things Another thing so many fuji-lovers mention: the X-trans sensors produces some really nice pictures. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Look into Fuji xs10/20 or xh1 for a body with ibis (which can help in low light situation if you're shooting still subject like cityscape, but add bulkiness), or Fuji xt30 II or Fuji xe-4 for a compact body (but no ibis), in your budget you can probably get on the used market a body + 18-55 (maybe 18-80?) + 35f2 for compact street lens with a amateur-pro production of photos: more MP, more Dynamic range, better low light high ISO noise performance, shallower DoF (APS-C), film simulations, and yet still compact enough to always carry with me on trips (compared to FF). Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Business, Economics, and Finance. The flash catches the hood and it shows up. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! For most people the X-T3 is the move. xt-3, generic lens 18-55 looking to upgrade to xt-5 or a maybe sony or canon/nikon, i feel my xt-3 isnt the sharpest, and disappointed with low light. Fuji has a list of lens that supposedly make the 40MP sensor shine. 2 is slow and hunts, the 23/1. And KEH is a reliable store. Great shot, I really like it! I have a love-hate relationship with the 50-230mm lens. AF in low light will favour the X-T30. Also overall likely pricier. It’s just physics. The XH1 is a generation before the XT4, so I can see why it wasn't working for you. The one thing you won’t get is the hybrid viewfinder, which has its own issues anyways. İf the budget is including a lens there arent many full frame options other than canon rp or nikon z5 for low light for 1k so a fujifilm camera like fujifilm xh1 with a 24mm lens would be good, The eos rp might be the best option since the hate it gets for low dynamic range is definitely an overrated issue elevated on the internet. I will say that between the XH2 (40MP sensor) and the XH2S (26MP stacked sensor) my recollection from reviews is that the XH2S actually has the better low light performance and will give you sharper low light images with less digital noise. 4 lenses, lighting to compensate. I haven't gone to see their condition in-person yet, but the XT30 is going for $450 and the XH1 for $550 (these prices are converted from local currency so I don't know if these would be considered good prices overseas, but at a new XT30ii + 18 - 55mm kit lens is about $940 here for reference). GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. You also have to think about lens as well, minimum f1. AF was fast and accurate. 2 lens on apsc. The x t3 is my work horse camera and for when i need video. I love it generally but I feel like the autofocus isn't great and the low light performance is pretty bad. 6400 is pushing it but you can still work with it, 3200 is maximum for me. From a Photographer standpoint, the Fuji has better colors straight out of camera. A7iii is an all-around tool like the xh1, but with better Image quality, DR, battery life and low light capability. Build quality of the Zf is great, too; as someone has already mentioned, Fujifilm cameras feel like toys after handling a Zf. 4 are supposedly standout good because they resolve so well for 40 megapixel sensors, a lot of people will tell you that the XF16 f/1. I wish more people would read up on how sensors actually work. Do you care? For example the LUMIX S line is well regarded for hybrid performance as are Sony’s. The XT4 was a huge generation step up for video from the XH1, and the XH2s is another leap. Better AF, better low-light performance, more 3rd party lens options, better dynamic range. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! The new XF33 f/1. Full frame sensors are larger, lenses are physically wider, so more light is available. But not much does, and the Fuji's definitely hold their own, and are not "so slow" or "slowest in class" (whatever tf class that is) The Fuji's also depend on the lens - the 56/1. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! The X-T5 has better ergonomics and is smaller, but the image quality, dynamic range, auto focus and low light performance of the Zf are significantly better. I would say the only real advantage of the X-H1 is the IBIS. I have gotten into deep space astrophotography where low light performance (obviously) really matters and the actual sensor size is about the last thing I consider when thinking about image quality because all other things being equal (pixel size, full well depth, quantum efficiency, thermal noise, shot Hello, could I ask for help on where you use the panoramic function on the Xh1? I have used this function before in sunny conditions so the shutter speed is quick. I recently acquired a mint edition Fuji XH1 - however I can’t seem to get the camera to switch out of the auto setting in movie mode. just did some casual family dinner shoot. I shoot in flog for max dynamic range. Does it keep up with the D750/850 in extremely low light? No. The biggest benefits to the xt3 over an xpro2 is the tilty screen and having access to metering modes and drive modes via switches as opposed to through the q menu It’s hard to compete with the low-light performance of full frame. Fuji cameras are pretty good in low light so cranking up the ISO is not that big of a deal. I'm an amateur street and portrait photographer - currently shooting a Sony a6400 and loving it. Not great in low light but none of the APC trans sensors are. There's a bit better AF but you'll need the new X-H2/T5/H2S to get a big jump in AF performance. Your observation is correct in that it’s actually cheaper to get better low light performance per dollar with the Z system compared to Fuji. So black friday/ holiday season is near, thinking of picking up either a XH1 or a XT3 this christmas but I'm not sure which I prefer. Maybe compare the fast prime options available for each system, but keep in mind that an f/1. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! I've had an xt1 for years. It is mostly a tricked-out X-T2. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. I switched to the Fuji mainly for size and film simulations. i have tried testing xh1 w 18-135 in a room with light spilled in from the living room thru a almost closed door. Fuji would be very low on the list. You said it yourself. Fuji X-H1 is a great camera. For what you'd be saving in the long-run, you'd probably be able to get a really good lens in low light for cheap. 4 for Fuji will effectively be comparable to an f/1. 2 lens) using the new Backlit AF mode. Sep 2, 2020 · It focuses fast and accurately in both daylight and low-light conditions. Hey guys!! Firstly thanks so much for your answers in advance. Formula for lowest-noise low-light images (hand-held): Set the shutter speed fast enough to freeze the action and prevent camera shake†, but no faster Set the aperture narrow enough to have an acceptable depth-of-field, but no narrower. From a technical standpoint the Sony is a better camera. . If you really shoot a lot of low light or hand holding video, then the X-H1 may be the move. Its a decent price for an x-h1 that is in excellent condition. But the better low light can be mitigated with a faster lens, i rarely need more bokeh than my f1. XT4 is the current flagship and an excellent hybrid camera. The x pro 2 is for enjoyment when i don't need the better auto focus in low light or with fast moving subjects. I'm not sure if that's 100% because of the stacked sensor or because there are now "too many" pixels in Stuff I lost by selling the Sony: that full frame "look", low light performance at ISO 3200/6400+, adapted lens flexibility (due to crop), AF performance, probably video stuff, IBIS, resolution Stuff I gained from the fuji: lighter weight, smaller size, easy jpeg output as a viable option, controls that basically feel just like my M6 and FE Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. 8 apsc lens becomes equivalent of f/4. Fuji has some spectacular f/1. Fujifilm introduced shock absorbing suspension in the form of four springs attached to the mechanical shutter. If you can afford the A7iii it would be a great option. 7mm (62. I had the grip for my X-T1 and I have one for my X-T2. At the end of the day, if you're looking to not spend another couple grand on accessories for shooting, then like I said, G9 or XH1 all the way Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. but the low-light focus figure is improved due to better I shot canon until 2022 and agree with everything here. I still love it though It's time to upgrade. Nov 25, 2018 · xt1 was a pain in low light. Super undervalued. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Ive heard a lot of negatives about the X-H2 in low light compared to the X-H2s. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Nov 25, 2018 · XH1's AF meets my needs. I have really bad GAS and since I bought it I haven't been able to justify the purchase of another camera body, i can't match its features with Fuji cameras without at least doubling what I paid for it (~540 euro in an Ebay Auction). Why are you using AF for landscapes and cityscapes on a tripod though? You can, but you'll get more accurate results manually focusing. unfortunately my H-X1 is not a low light… Hi, I'm looking for advice regarding some used Fuji cameras at my local store. To me, the XH-2s is closer to the A7SIII than the A7IV when it comes to video work, and it is a better photo-camera than both of them (except for the AF-performance and low light-capabilities). Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Would be looking more at the Sony A7 series if you want something mirror or less for Astro. 1. 96K subscribers in the fujifilm community. This uses separate pixels on the sensor for autofocusing, allowing the AF pixels to overexpose for focusing in almost complete darkness without adversely affecting the overall Dare I say it is the best Fuji camera for under 800 euro you can get at the moment. Many choices there. Low light performance isn't really much of an issue anymore, these new sensors have an incredible dynamic range. 56K subscribers in the fujix community. 4 are both beautiful lenses. For that reason I went with Sony APSC FOR NOW. Hope this helps! Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. With most lenses, it will use three axes on the sensor (Roll, Y and X) and two on the lens (pitch and yaw) but with lenses that feature a more complex stabilisation system such as the 80mm macro, it will use 1 axis on the sensor (roll) and the rest on the lens (Y, X The colors are dull, it's useless in low light conditions, and if either the animal I'm taking a picture of moves or a leaf in the background moves, I just get a dull blur. Even my X-T10 was pretty admirable at 6400. I still love the size and weight of the X-T2 and I will still use it, especially when I want to rock one of my small primes and keep it light. The 10-24 is excellent, but the 18-135 is simply convenient. the low-light performance of every APS-C camera is the same, only bigger sensor can give you better low light performance. I have both and the differences between them are negligible, I only got the xt3 for the improved low-light performance, which having tested it further is a marginal improvement. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! The xt3/4 are a definite improvement over the earlier xt/xh cameras and I believe they have improved them again w in th the xt5/xh2 some lenses are slower to focus as well I find the 56mm 1. One problems is that my finger covers up the AF assist light 80% of the time Using the built in-flash with the lens hood on the 18-55 gets you a big ol' blob in the middle of your shot. XH1's AF meets my needs. Focus during daylight isn't going to differ much at all though tracking on the X-T30 is much better. May 2, 2018 · Before I pull the trigger on a new body, what is the capability of low light focusing on the XH1? I haven't had to do so much low light work until recently and I find my XT2 is struggling in that environment and looking to find solutions. Then the camera will give you its best low-light shot given the available light. like the light just gets sucked This is a great response. 6mm and weighs 658g including battery. No-brainer for me. X-T3 will shoot 10-bit video; X-H1 will not. Xt5 is the obvious choice if price wasn't a consideration. The wider focal length it nice, But nothing dealbreaking for me. Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask… Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. Based on the research I've done, it sounds like there's a discontinued mirrorless camera called the Fujifilm X-H1 that might need my needs. Consider that fuji X-H1 was one of the first Fuji cameras with IBIS and weather sealing, if you look on reviews you will find mixed reviews about these two features are worth it compared to get an X-T3 or another camera at similar Price range. If Sony suddenly disappeared, I would go Canon. However in low light there seems to be motion blur when zoomed in. 4 versions, and the the XF23 f1. If the Fuji was priced $300 less, it would have been much more wanted camera. My husband kindly offered to get me a new camera body for Christmas as I'm running up against the limitations of no IBIS for longer handheld exposures and so-so low-light performance. So the small iphone 15 sesnor is no match for an old APSC camera in low light. Full frame will give you better low light and shallower DOF. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Posted by u/joeldiramon - 1 vote and 5 comments Mar 28, 2018 · The Fujifilm X-H1 camera adds in-body stabilization to the X series and offers loads of tools for both photographers and videographers. If you prefer the more film look with your images the Fuji would also be the better option. With any of those models you will get faster camera operation, better autofocus performance, better manual focus assist options, better low light performance, etc. FF will be heavier and larger. The biggest difference between the lenses will be the depth of field IMO. 2 is just a rockstar. I also see an advantage for low light when it's an awkward angle and your camera is on a tripod while adjusting settings CONS: Does not feel comfortable in my hands buttons are too small ( I belive I can get use to it but would rather not) Not as great low light performance as the sony a7ii Hard to upgrade to full frame (have to sell camera and lenses in the future) XH1 with battery grip $999. Mar 15, 2018 · Gh5 for example priced the same, but it has a killer video features so the price is excusable. This one feels even more solid. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Mar 26, 2018 · Above left: Fujifilm XH1, above right: Fujifilm GFX . Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! Hey Fujifilm folks. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! If it's apsc and within 5 years, then you'll get pretty much the same low light performance, minimal noise up to 1400ish range ISO. I myself prefer the “qualities” of the images from that sensor to those from the X-T3’s, which appear more “digital” and noisier in low light/higher ISO. Crypto The low light performance is fantastic Autofocus is quirky. What are your thoughts about this lens? Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. Related Topics With the low clouds and dead trees, b&w adds to the “moody” character of the image. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! The X-T4 is a good choice if you stick with Fujifilm, but the obvious upgrade if you can afford it would be the XH2S, as it has everything you listed. Fuji XH1, 16mm 2. Closing. Specially I love the grip. its perfect with the prime lenses and also the 16-55 and better low light performance with FF gear is a different matter. Whether you love Fujifilm's X-Trans mirrorless cameras, GFX medium format cameras, their other digital cameras and DSLRs, or Instax instant film cameras - this is the place for you! MINT＊FUJIFILM X-H1 Digital Camera VPB-XH1 Vertical Power Booster Grip From JAPAN. 4 and XF35 f1. Now I can go hand held with confidence. Xt3 seems like an all round good deal. Its a really tough decision though. Sony APSC is between them, the Sigma lenses has excelleing quality, but they are bigger than Fuji lenses, and still provide good low light performance, and decent DFO though not as good as FF would do, also ASPC lenses has better reach my 18-135 is eqivalent of 24-202 wich is great. It is more fun and smaller. Only a bigger sensor can give you better low light performance. The Fuji system is great. 99+ 18-55mm used for $270= $1270 Previously I would be forced to use a monopod when shooting in low light with my XF56mm and XF90mm lenses. Sep 6, 2018 · Depending on how advanced the OIS is, the X-H1 will adjust the amount of correction between sensor and optical stabilisation. which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general Because full-frame is not end-all, be-all of the photography world. 95 if you want extra light-gathering and don’t mind the manual focus. And it has quite a bit of control of continuous AF behavior, allowing one to tweak AF tracking sensitivity, speed tracking sensitivity and zone Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask questions, discuss digital photography, cameras and lenses, and share gear news and rumors. Also the files are a bit more easy to handle. If you don't need IBIS, there's also the X-T3 which has the same sensor and, currently, the same AF performance, or if you do need IBIS, there's the X-S10, whose control layout you may find to be more familiar, coming That said, you're comparing a FF to a crop body, there's gonna be some compromises compared to the Sony including price, and now battery life. The low light of the Fuji will probably surprise you if you use fast lenses and stay around 3200 or below, pretty darn clean. This can be advantageous for landscape and wildlife photography. And if I did want to change, there's nothing about Fuji that makes me want to use their system. If u want best low light performance typically full frame will be better than aspc for that given the pure physics behind a larger sensor. In ideal lighting conditions, or if you’re an expert in artificial light, crop sensors can perform very well, indeed. It's an overhyped format the newbies and YouTubers have touted for years that actually have minimal advantages over APSC. I'm sure you will get better low light performance with something like the A7IV but if you want to stick with Fujifilm, the XH2S is a beast of a camera. Probably the X-H series have the better ergonomics of all the Fuji ASP-C cameras. 297 votes, 40 comments. For low light you'll probably find yourself wanting larger apertures than f/2. I jumped from canon to Fuji a 5 months ago but i recently started doing a lot for Fire-ground photography. You could also pick up the Mikaton 35 f/0. But I don't think it's helpful to say that Fuji cameras from over 2 generations ago aren't comparable to current gen cameras. Can you with the free version of Capture one actually 'Stich' the images together ? I have the XT4, and the XH2s. What I really like about Fuji is that it feels like it's made for photographers that know what they're doing. Fuji can’t record 10 bit 4:2:2 in camera (you would need a external monitor), so you will need to shoot 10 bit 4:2:0 Yes it does, I don’t use it very often though. Beside the auto focus i enjoy the more streamlined layout and functionality for photography. I was surprised how well Fujis handled low-light. Its eye detection works reasonably well when shooting wide open with large-aperture lenses like the Fujinon XF 56mm f/1. The 5d does give shallower depth of field,is better in low light, and it is able to have wider lenses. etc. I use it for video. I knew you weren't an idiot. Meanwhile, Panasonic’s Lumix G9 measures 137x97x91. 2 R.