Nvenc vs cpu encoding 2022. 264 for the stream, and NVENC H.

• Nvenc vs cpu encoding 2022 You would need a two PC set up and a beefy CPU to beat out NVENC with x264. If you want a DNxHR file, that will be Keep in mind that cpu and gpu encoding settings have different weight, you can't compare them. I stream mostly Warzone. Possibly hold for now until the midrange 40-series come out, as they have Ive never heard of anyone using NVENC in a 2nd pc lol. Answers: Generally speaking, the priority of CPU encoding is quality while GPU encoding Before you start changing, if you haven't, try a FPS lock in the game, and lock your FPS to 60. VEGAS Movie Studio - Try before you buy! (applies to VEGAS Pro as well) VEGAS Support updated Oct. Nvenc vs Nvenc new: video quality . If you have an Nvidia GPU, use the AV1 NVENC encoder for fast NVIDIA NvEnc vs. Encoding is encoding is encoding. You will see less usage on the CPU but the quality of nvenc is a bit worse than with your CPU but imo not really noticeable. 1 CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Encoding Time: I understood the trade-offs between size/quality regarding x265 vs NVENC, and knew NVENC was going to produce a bigger file. 30 July, 2022. As for quality: at low bitrates CPU > GPU encoding, but start going up and you're not going to be able to tell after a point. – It's hard to find a lot of data online so I am posting my comparison MY PC SETUP CPU Encoding using 14900F with limit to NVIDIA NVENC achieves an encoding speed of 301 FPS, while SVT-AV1 reaches 27 FPS on the Intel Core i9-14900F processor. As to what is better Quicksync vs NVENC, it totally depends on hardware You would have to use a somewhat slow preset for CPU encoding to keep up with NVENC hardware encoding in terms of quality for streaming. Nvenc (Nvidia Encoder) takes all the strain off your CPU and typically encodes faster as well. NVENC is actually not far off of software, though I would still use software encoding. You can't customize much, afaik it does not support film grain synthesis and even the slowest preset is a lot worse than normal CPU encoding. Hello, I have a 3060 Ti so I am using NVENC for GPU encoding in H. 265 vs CPU encoding. It only relies on raw computing power of your CPU. Once you have your video file, you can use handbrake to transcode it but I don't think you can do nvenc two pass encoding with it. CPU will take forever to encode the same video in comparison, though. I actually used NVENC on my old stream PC, because the GPU was stronger than the CPU. Native vs Nvidia encoding . You've discovered the main differences between CPU vs GPU. H264 and 265 he accelerated decoding is also paid only If you want h264, probably faster to export DNxHR HQ and use Handbrake with Nvenc for 264. I'm running a Gigabyte GPU encoding gets better every generation. YMMV and it depends on your use case. If you have an older, slower CPU, however, you could use NVENC on the GPU instead. I want to use: CPU (Sandy Bridge supports h. Not bad. I am using the Regular Linux Release But haven't had much success getting nvenc working. Would sell the GPU and go for a 3080. (e. RTX NVENC vs. 264 and h. Instead I plan to use either If I do HEVC NVENC 10-bit, I'll get around 25-30 FPS, which is much more reasonable. Quality and file size are sacrificed for speed. Post your FPS for your CPU vs your iGPU using handbrake. Weird, because 5900X should handle slow without issues. I'm running a Gigabyte RTX 3070 (vision) 8gb VRAM paired with a i7-9700k CPU. Navi Streaming TestRead tests description:We often get questions about the streaming quality of the encoder I would say that you use the CPU. The Turing generation now promises Do professional video editors often render in Nvenc or CPU encoding when presented with the option? Is CPU encoding even worth it if the quality is unnoticeable, or are there cases where I currently have a bunch of video to encode using HandBrake, during the process, I discovered that even using H. Skips a step, so more performant. I am a bot - This action was done automatically. As to what is better Quicksync vs NVENC, it totally depends on hardware generation, the content, and the options used. RADEON AVC = Bad (Horrible if compared to X264 fast, medium & slow, and also if compared to Nvenc new). Locked post. Like others pointed out, the library you use will dictate GPU vs. QuickSync is a software that uses the hardware inside your iGPU (the graphics part of your Intel CPU, not the "CPU" part of the CPU) to encode into H. But we can see that GPU accelerated encoder NVENC can be inefficient in quality per bitrate. For the past 8 months or so I've been running JF hardware wise on an AMD R 5 2400G for CPU, Current transcode performance - NVENC, vs. A huge deal is hardware acceleration of h. I don't think TV show DVDs are going to show you very much difference between CPU vs GPU encoding. For example, there is also intel’s onboard gpu in the K edition which has its own encoding/decoding capabilities that reportedly surpass that of consumer GPU tech such as the Ampere GPU’s, and take precedence over the latest gpu technologies When talking 8-bit vs. NVENC on 20 series and newer cards under x. QSV vs NVenc . 264 input not h. Using nvenc is what prompted me to spend ridiculous amounts on SSD storage. Question Linux Intel GPU drivers for ds3615xs | Plex HW Encoding Just received my ARC a380 and running a sample of DUNE at 4k. 264 encoding is much faster than CPU based x264 encoding, and the former delivers little performance loss. I think DLSS will work for you in that aspect. IMHO, the GPU-based encoders are only good for the thing they were specifically designed for e. 5 hours most of the time. Reply reply Cubelia • 5xxx apu might actually be good for a streaming box as long as you tune cpu encoding. 264 encoder. CPU x264 slow/medium > Turing nvenc > recent quicksync > Pascal Nvenc > older I started encoding my library with a Nvidia Turing card, both bluray and uhd Blu Ray. With common Twitch and YouTube streaming settings, NVENC-based hardware encoding in GA10x GPUs exceeds the encoding quality of software-based x264 encoders using the Fast preset and is on par with x264 Medium, a preset that For reference, there 8 generations of NVENC hardware encoders at this point, with newer ones having different features and sometimes better encoding (eg - 8th gen NVENC used on the 4000 series includes AV1 encoding). I also have a 4090 and while GPU encoding is way faster (about 3x faster), but I think CPU encoding on the 13900k is fast enough and worth the better quality/lower file size. I opt to use Quick Sync because my GPU will run hotter using Nvenc. Especially if it uses only up to 20% total CPU usage for encoding. Well, nope, I was using x264 on 864p @ fast, switched to the new nvenc chip on the rtx cards and have a better stream quality since then. H. It seems that double the performance cores in M1 Pro yields a 70-80% performance increase in x265 CPU-based encoding at the same settings in Handbrake. bad quality) when I compare it to the HowTos I And in these cases the GPU encoding on modern hardware can be better. Re: Does NVENC / x264 encoding creates any in-game inputlag? Post by The point is to get a clear and correct answer to my question above. For MPEG support you will have to consider iGPU or AMD. Most if not all people use cpu encoding in the 2nd pc. Relative to NVENC, AMD’s VCN continues to fall behind. . QSV . On top of that, the 470 is a bit of an old card and is likely already being maxed out in games so trying to do GPU encoding would likely be a mess. Still learning about this kind of stuff so any adobe is helpful Check EposVox's video: ''AMF vs QSC vs Nvenc vs X264'' so get more details about CPU encoding and AMF/VCE. I have tested 2 encodes with CQ 20 and encoder presets of Medium and Slowest. H264 and H265 seems to be much inferior to the one used by Handbrake. 265 NVENC and H. Working Current Setup: GPU or CPU encoding Question I have an RTX 2080 super card and a i9 12900k CPU. At the same time a quality value of 28 seems pretty high (i. Nvenc is most commonly used with graphics cards that do not have a dedicated encoder chip. I have personally been having great results with NVENC H265 in Handbrake, but I am sure you'd have even better results if you used Handbrake's CPU H265 encoder. I have streamed for years and I've used all three. I streamed Spider-Man and Horizon Zero Dawn this week and even though I'm using the Nvenc encoder and OBS was utilizing less than 10% of the CPU, I was getting way lower FPS in these games than I should. 265 for the local recording. The title mentions NVENC because I found a decently priced Lenovo Gaming laptop with 8GB RAM, core i51135g7, and a GTX 1650 card. Hello， I’m using an IMX390 camera and found that h264 encoding is particularly high on the cpu load. So how many threads for encoding can OBS really use? Because even with low CPU usage i still get some stutter in my stream. 265 CPU and the CPU has a smaller file size. I am getting errors to do with codecs not being supported . Newer generations of RTX GPU You should definitely go with Nvidia 3070 Ti for streaming purposes, Nvenc is proven more reliable and provides a better quality than X264 , so i would recommend getting that 3070 ti GeForce RTX GPUs have dedicated hardware encoders (NVENC), letting you capture and stream content without impacting GPU or CPU performance. When doing a single PC using NVENC, there should be no more than a 5-10fps hit, Thats saying your using QUALITY with Look Ahead off. u/countercruel Does NVENC / x264 encoding creates any in-game inputlag? Post by Yukai » 18 Sep And If I'd have to upgrade — what is a better bet? Better CPU for x264 high-quality settings or 40xx series gpu for better NVENC and Posts: 277 Joined: 16 Nov 2022, 18:47. What you see in the preview in OBS it's not the real output but the real view of the program. Isnt the purpose of NVENC to reduce resources so you can steam in your gaming In this video you will see some charts that will represent different speeds and file size of the following encoders: CPU vs CUDA vs CUDA+CPU vs H264 NVENC vs Nvenc in my experience is fast and efficient on system processes, but it is very hungry on disk space when set to a CQP of 20 or less. 264 for the stream, and NVENC H. CPU x264 slow/medium > Turing nvenc > recent quicksync > Pascal Nvenc > older nvenc/quicksync > any AMD AMF. 10 It seemed to work fine, and NVENC (even on my GTX 1070, which has slightly worse encoding quality than the newer RTX-era NVENC) isn’t too far off the quality I would be getting out of x264 either. Almost no usage. Hello, thank you for your replies. Supposedly the claim was that it was about Medium when compared to CPU encodes. reReddit: Top posts of November 2022. CPU encoding: Can the video encoder of the Turing cards be used for twitch streaming and keep up with a CPU? Analysis with Netflix VMAF x265 is a specific software encoder for H. It is my understanding that it can take the game frame buffer on the GPU and send it directly to the nvenc encoder without ever having to go through the CPU. 265 is superior because even though it is more computationally complex, it can compress better. (i3-12100) and NVEnc (3060 Ti) is really noticeable. 265, and very efficient for H. It seems like the major changes are AV1 encoding support, and possibly multiple NVENC chips, allowing for up to 8K encoding, or more concurrent sessions (like to stream and local record at the same time in two different quality settings). reReddit: Top posts of August 2022. I don't think there is a plugin yet that does what you are asking, which is figure out what the node has for a GPU and then use it or failback to using CPU. reReddit: Top posts of 2022 &nbsp; &nbsp; TOPICS. Hardware encoding is meant to be fast, so you'll have to choose whether to increase the bitrate to get good quality or just accept the lower quality. Well, I bought a 16" MacBook Pro with 10-core M1 Pro CPU, and tested. It seems people using docker or unraid fair a bit better. I wonder though why my CPU load is 80%. It produces the best quality and filesize. It's much more efficient to use both, that being said maybe using just NVENC could be different to this, but I haven't been able to notice any difference in quality. H264 encoding HW acceleration is paid Only. CPU or GPU encoding, which should I use?" - from Reddit . Plus there's somewhat of a green hue introduced by NVENC. I looked up tons of guides & youtube vids, despite my specs I am still getting the "Encoding Overload" warning and my GPU usage is at 90-98% even with low activity on the screen. Hardware encoders seem to struggle with more complex frames. Like if you record at 15mbps you're probably not going to tell TLDR Hello, thank you for your replies. if your spending a pretty penny for a nice cpu anyway then the 15-30 2022. NVENC is absolutely knocking it out of the park on encoding quality. How to achieve the quality of X264&X265 2pass slow with NVENC HEVC?STAXRIP. Like if you record at 15mbps you're probably not going to tell TLDR GPU for speed, CPU for quality but only at a low enough bitrate to actually see it. What are you trying to achieve with the encoding exactly? Because 370mb seems already quite small. With the right profile/settings you should get very minimal performance hit and the quality is better than the Thanks to Chips and Cheese tech media, we have information about AMD's Video Core Next (VCN) encoder found in RDNA2 GPUs and NVIDIA's NVENC (short for NVIDIA Nvidia’s NVENC performs better than x264 medium in eight of eleven sequences. 2. libx264 is a software (CPU) based H. Does the NVENC have similar quality as the CPU? Overall, my priorities (in order but not absolute): 1. If you have a different CPU already, Ampere is noticeably better quality than AMD's current offerings, and also Ampere is significantly higher performance in productivity work, due to having 2xFP32 performance, so the 3070 should be superior for your Which Encoder would be the best for streaming and video recording? I got an amd graphics card so unfortunately I can't make use of nvenc and I also dont know if I should use my cpu with its 10c/20t or my new graphics card to stream/record. However i see that some threads are bearely used. Even on my computer with a 3900x CPU. CPU encoding is much sharper at the same bitrate and quality settings. You, and others, might have some serious misconceptions about how things work under the hood. This is a real hardwar. realtime/semi-realtime transcoding, - handbrake "nvenc" "default" vs "high quality" I have a decent grasp of the differences between CPU-based encoding (such as with x265) vs Nvidia's GPU encoder, Last Post: 14th Jan 2022, 04:42. I've of course searched this topic before, I know Nvenc works far faster typically but CPU encoding is deemed higher quality and more precise, albeit not CPU vs GPU: Prior to the 1050ti, I tried using the GPU on an AMD APU. I prefer CPU-based encoding for quality reasons, as well as smaller file sizes. h264_nvenc uses the NVidia hardware assisted H. If you have done this, backup your settings (just take a screenshot, make sure you can revert back. It was much faster but the quality was not great. I even symlinked my ffmpeg. Even tho 8700k is a nice chip, if you go and set x264 in a way your stream looks decent you're gonna be having hard time running any games without noticeable impact in performance. Most people switch due to performance So Nvenc vs AMF for streaming => AMF looks like crap with low bitrate -> go with nvenc Nvenc vs AMF for recording / encoding in premiere, davinci => AMF looks like Nvenc with the same cqp That gives you the equivalent quality level to match Hardware vs Software encoding. Subjectively, none of the encoders here do a particularly All moderns gpus now support video hardware encoding which encodes h. Also what does "best" mean? "best encoding speed", "best quality", smallest file size? NVENC h264 can be very fast to encode, but that depends on your GPU and CPU. Whoa, hold on a sec. Also, if you are recording or streaming GPU encoding is one hot topic, especially talking about 4K UHD encodings where we see huge manufactures still a bit afraid of GPU video encoding since that will sell less Hey guys! I posted a thread awhile back on the Twitch subreddit, discussing how I wanted to use my second computer as a dual-streaming PC, how I wanted to set it up with NVENC, and how Turing nvenc is comparable to x264 medium/fast depending on the clip, and Ampere is the same as Turing. 265 as well as resolutions up to 8K are supported. Sony Vegas vs. Read elsewhere that some of the encoding work (eg audio, demux) is still done For 10-series cards, you still get a performance bump with NVENC (New) instead of NVENC, however it's just not as sizable as the newer cards. This update It's 2022. So Nvenc vs AMF for streaming => AMF looks like crap with low bitrate -> go with nvenc Nvenc vs AMF for recording / encoding in premiere, davinci => AMF looks like Nvenc with the same cqp but will need a higher bitrate. What I found is H. Just make sure on Handbrake you only change the encoder, x264 for CPU, and NVENC h264 for GPU. Usually I stream 'Escape From Tarkov' and I haven't ran into any issues when using NVENC encoding until the recent release of Call of Duty: MW2. Keep in mind even the RTX 2080 will not encode and decode all the variations of H. X264 will take more cpu overhead, but the files can be much smaller for a similar video quality. Software encoding turns the tables with the ESO clip. At the very end neither Nvenc or Quick Sync are used and the CPU gets hit hard. 264 software on slow setting, though it will lag behind software x. Basically, old NVENC used to use the NVENC API really inefficiently- it had to copy the frame from your GPU's VRAM into your system RAM to encode it. h264_nvenc is only available on NVIDIA hardware. Gpu encoding can't do as much while cpu encoding is really good at low bitrates, For good quality gpu encoding you need way too high bitrate. 1 hour ago, milesuy said: I dont think changing encoding processors (GPU vs CPU) would change the file-size. e. Nvenc vs x264 (5900x) I know that x264 uses cpu power so I guess my question is, is the 5900x powerful enough to handle encoding and running games at the same time or is nvenc just better since it’ll use gpu instead. NVENC-based Video Encoding Performance. I’m used to encoding using h265 nvenc with handbrake. Learning that as I get deeper into this. X264 will take more cpu overhead, but the files can be Depending on what settings you use, you can ABSOLUTELY reencode more than 6TB worth of media. Re: Hardware acceleration (QSV/NVENC) vs direct to disk for lower CPU load? Post by HeneryH » Mon Jun 01, 2020 4:55 pm If you use anything other than a business surplus HP or Dell with a consumer Intel chip and a fresh install of Win-10 and use this machine ANYTHING other than BI and you don't run behind a VPN then you are an . What you are streaming, it doesn't seem like you're going to have any issues with encoding with either. But the problem in the past was that NVENC’s quality wasn’t comparable to X264 at 6 Mbps or lower. 265 10-bit x265 Constant Quality: 20 RF Encoder Preset: Medium Encoder Profile: Main 10 Encoder Level: 5. As an example, I streamed Super Mario RPG on Twitch at 1440p Would sell the GPU and go for a 3080. You need to watch the video again. So now that that's out of the way lets move on to hardware only encoding and Hardware encoding simply uses fixed functions specialised for exactly one task. No GPU encoder can match So, a non-F 12000 series Intel CPU + RX 6800 would get you top-tier encoding quality while not compromising on performance. Possibly hold for now until the midrange 40-series come out, as they have dual AV1 encoders that outperform both Intel ARC and AMD's implementations. I had to blow an image up to see the Thanks for the replies! Liquid cooling works well. The AMF encoder was able to close in on Nvidia's newest NVENC encoder found in its RTX 20 series and 30 series GPUs. 265 is x265 (CPU encoding) and NVENC HEVC (hardware encoding). I've seen Nvidia's NVENC codec is better than AMD's, but only for streaming. Both of these options come with their own set of advantages. Very high movement scenes = nvenc, average triple a games = cpu Reply reply Generated by PCPartPicker 2022-10-13 01:22 EDT-0400 This bot is in no way associated with PC Part Picker. Graphic Cards (GPU) Common 4- and 6-cores very quickly reach their performance limits in pure CPU encoding (x264), Go to solution Solved by Origami Cactus, April 24, 2022. Good quality, small output size, fast encoding: pick two. The Nvenc encoder is aimed at streamers who need to encode as close to real-time as possible. With my 3070, i used to get between 300-400 fps (1080p video) With the 4080 i Only get 180-200fps (same video) Encoder on the 4080 is only used at about 30% (as show in task manager infos) Considering the 5900X is a beast of a CPU I recommend you try CPU encoding at least once. You must have missed that part. A closer look at encoding performance. Usually, people don't want to get a new computer, so encoding quality will be driven by your existing CPU and GPU. encoder : NVIDIA NVENC H. For the most part, NVENC is better than any other realtime encoding option with a modern card and the right settings. I have tested CPU encoding with an AMD FX 8 core and an Nvidia GTX 460. At the same size, QSV makes dark and fast scenes Considering the 5900X is a beast of a CPU I recommend you try CPU encoding at least once. For Nvidia Geforce Encoding you have to use StaxRip. I'd love to use a GPU for transcoding but not encoding. Nvenc for casual streamers, cpu encoding for pro streamers. This option rarely hurts performance. 265. Will be encoding 4k drone footage. 265 dramatically outperforming H. 264 and H. Video Encoding is CPU demanding and will eat into your editing time if not taken into consideration when buying or upgrading a PC. It's best used as a way to offload CPU usage during streaming and it can't be matched in this regard but I can't take NVenc seriously as a movie archival tool, NVEnc Av1 is marginally better than the outgoing HVEC before it. Crypto But yes, theoretically, AOM-AV1 or SVT-AV1 (software AV1 encoders like x264) are theoretically better than Nvenc AV1 but they are so slow and demanding on the CPU that they're impractical to use and will drop frames for real time encoding on most computers. To the best of my knowledge AV1 hardware encoding is available on Intel GPUs and the nVidia RTX 4000 series so Re: Hardware acceleration (QSV/NVENC) vs direct to disk for lower CPU load? Post by HeneryH » Mon Jun 01, 2020 4:55 pm If you use anything other than a business surplus HP or Dell with a consumer Intel chip and a fresh install of Win-10 and use this machine ANYTHING other than BI and you don't run behind a VPN then you are an . But streaming just with 1 PC the 3070 did a great job! In fact there are no "best" settings, its depending on your use case. For some time now, a separate encoding chip, which Nvidia NvEnc has christened Nvidia NvEnc, has been used in many NVIDIA graphics cards. But it only does h. NVENC, because encoding chip is separate from the actual graphics processing unit so encoding with nvenc has little to no impact to your gameplay. GA10x GPUs include the seventh generation NVENC encoder unit that was introduced with the Turing architecture. 265 video, it has nothing to do with NVENC. 4-latest-win64-gpl-4. That's roughly my stance too. The impact of it is OBS will use more CPU resources and may risk frame drops on your content especially videogames, in addition it might also overload the encoder itself, making you lose frames in encoding. When doing 8 camera encoding, the cpu load is as high as 150%. h264_nvenc is probably faster and uses less power. To the best of my knowledge AV1 hardware encoding is available on Intel GPUs and the nVidia RTX 4000 series so Just curious what people think about Blu-ray content compressed by x264 vs the same content compressed by NVENC H265 on an Ampere or Turing card like Always use CPU encoding for offline stuff like movies. These cards are usually older models. NVENC is hardware-based and is run on a dedicated part of your GPU designed to encode and decode video. HandBrake CPU or GPU Encoding, Which Is Better? "Last year someone asked here if GPU encoding was worth it and was told to stick to CPU encoding. Fixed bitrate? More quality for the same value compared to H. AMD VCE Encoder - RTX Turing vs. If anything the chart shows why releasers chose M6 to transcode everything. I plan to use Intel gen 13 and Nvidia ampere tech. so if you have anything older than a 30 series (they might have them on the 20 series but im not sure) then nvenc will take away compute cycles from the gpu After some tinkering, I realized that if I kept all things the same but changed my encoder from NVENC HEVC (which I have been using from the beginning) to NVENC H. Whereas NVENC doesn't have all those advanced encoding options, but it's quite a bit faster. That being said I thought you originally wanted to know how to switch between Nvenc and Quick Sync and now I've used this PC for single streaming the past few weeks, using NVENC of course. Two encoding options are available for Nvenc in OBS and Streamlabs: Nvenc and Nvenc new. With new NVENC i don't get that lag. GPU encoding gets better every generation. Nvidia calls it nvenc, AMD calls it VCE, and intel calls it quick sync. You would need a two PC set up and a beefy CPU to beat out NVENC As you can see from my title that is long, sorry about that, I've been reading about the nvidia nvenc encoding for streaming recently ever since they mentioned it during CES. The downside is that it takes more time to encode. This is the state of For 10-series cards, you still get a performance bump with NVENC (New) instead of NVENC, however it's just not as sizable as the newer cards. 265 encoding/decoding also via Quick Sync Video) for decoding and; GPU for encoding (since my GPU card does not Ive never heard of anyone using NVENC in a 2nd pc lol. You do have an option on where to Encode. CPU vs GPU (Nvidia NVENC): x264 encoding benchmark Benchmarks Archived post. depends on the gpu youre using. 264(NVEnc) encoder, my CPU is still at a 100% usage in the From what I've heard, the h. Now, I am aware hardware encoding isn't as efficient as CPU encoding. The values of medium, fast and veryfast are very close together and veryfast gives Due to low quality of early iterations of QSV, Intel Core-i-CPU 4xxx (Haswell) or newer is recommended. reReddit: Top posts of 2022 &nbsp; That's plenty of time for software encoders to deliver significant gains and even introduce new paradigms. You're looking at spinning rust to record, DLSS on Cyberpunk does wonders. The "-b:v 0M" sets the target bitrate to zero because if you think about it, the ideal bitrate is going to be as close to zero as possible. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. I figured a 3080 would be more than good enough to handle this kind of game and record 4k 60fps since in the videos I watched they used less powerful GPUs. With the RTX generation the resulting quality should be on par with x264. RADEON HEVC = Excellent (Better than X264 fast & medium and also a bit better than NVenc H264. I understand that CPU encoding is definitely the best option but I have a sort of 'niche' where I need a bias towards speed/efficiency over raw quality, but in comparisons I've done already, NVENC H265 (RTX30) is vastly superior to AMD H265 (Vega) at the relatively low bit-rates I need (<8-6mbps). GPU is much faster, but leaves you with a much bigger file size. Ended up deleting them all and then using CPU encoding. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I used Babylon 5 film DVDs for the testing. AMD Nvenc used to be faster but Premiere Pro is starting to make better use of Intels Quick Sync. I am fine if the difference is very small. Everything is working 100% correct. CPU only rendering died a long time ago. Old Nvenc, yes, cpu encoding was better, new rtx and gtx 1660/ti, you need a really really beefy cpu to have a better, more consistant quality. I'm fully aware and fully understand the whole argument of "CPU encoding is better". Hi, Just got a 4080. Should I be using hardware (NVENC) encoding or software encoding? Of you can be bothered, some tips for optimising setting for whichever option you suggest would be greatly appreciated. If I can get a machine with that GPU in my price range, should I prioritize it for NVENC encoding over a cheaper pc with the same CPU I already know works? I appreciate any tips/suggestions. The CPU does not get hot using Quick Sync. Also, if you are recording or streaming while playing a game, you risk the gameplay performance being affected by using the CPU encoder. x265 slow. 264 video encoding performance table below, we get to know that NVENC hardware accelerated H. ⚠️ Make sure to use your primary graphics adapter's hardware h264_nvenc uses the NVidia hardware assisted H. Once you have your video file, Like the old axiom of choosing between quality speed and price, where you get to pick 2 and the 3rd (leg of a triangle) becomes a given (not something you can control), Turing nvenc is comparable to x264 medium/fast depending on the clip, and Ampere is the same as Turing. It will have great impact on your gaming performance depending on the requirements to just run Which NVIDIA cards have the built-in NVENC chip? So right now, we have an old CPU case (Cooler Master CMStorm white) that has the following components:-Intel Core i7 3770k-Nvidia If you use CPU encoding long enough while gaming using the same system, you may notice that although your FPS is fine you will likely encounter frame pacing issues. Most people switch due to performance issues while they are streaming. It will have great impact on your gaming performance depending on the requirements to just run the game. AMD AMF, vs. CQP? It's because x265 can use more advanced encoding options and reduce the file size. But the GPU is light-years faster encoding. CPU. 264 is way better than RNDA or older gpu encoding, and since streaming websites accept h. 265 video much faster than a CPU can. New In past tests you could get the same speed and quality if you just used a faster preset for CPU encoding. Unfortunately my Win11 doesn't show "Processor performance boost mode". It concerns me a lot since it's a big drop too. Well that's the thing - the CPU is still superior when it comes to quality and GPUs are designed to be much faster HOWEVER my understanding is that RTX 2000 series and up (including your 3060) have improved NVENC quality. VEGAS. In 20 series Nvidia did a big jump in nvenc and it continued in 30 and 40 series. 264/265 but the new Intel CPUs with the IGPU should. I mean, people can just derive the relative speed if we have enough CPU/GPU data. Also you're stuck with single-pass VBR encoding which can cause issues with video with lots of fast action and cuts while the buffer catches up. This means that NVIDIA NVENC is approximately 11 times faster than SVT-AV1 in terms of encoding speed. Not sure if there's a command line i should be putting in the advanced Good quality, small output size, fast encoding: pick two. I'm wondering, though, if I should try x264 when it's setup as a dedicated machine. NVENC New encodes directly from your GPU's VRAM. Your point is undermined by the fact you're using x265 settings that are unfavorable to the metrics (time, VMAF) and constraints (size) you're using for comparison; all you've demonstrated so far is that if you configure x265 poorly for your goals, you can get undesirable When rendering videos, I have the option of using Nvenc (Nvidia GPU) or my CPU to do the heavy lifting. Forum; PC Builds. At no point here do you compare CPU-transcoded video to GPU-transcoded video. Maxing out the settings for the GPU, 1080 bluray to H265 encoding look almost identical to original source (to my eyes) and take under an 1. NVENC is not really set up for encoding videos for offline playback. Had that happened on my 1080 TI Top posts of May 2022. I have a laptop RTX 4090, and was curious if nvenc AV1 encoding could match CPU encoding. I'd not do AMD with PD, in my view encoding reliability just not been there through the years with PD. 264 (new) Rate Control : CBR Hello there! I'm not very technical in terms of what I should be using to render this video project as quick as possible, as I understand there is the option for NVIDIA NVENC hardware accelerated rendering as an option but I'm not sure if it will actually be faster than normal rendering as I recall reading an article saying that those using a GTX graphics card Nvenc for casual streamers, cpu encoding for pro streamers. OBS (streaming), DLSS on Cyberpunk does wonders. Neither does this post prove the statement “CPU encoding at slower presets is better than GPU encoding. Nvenc helps, especially if for some reason you have an older and/or lower power cpu. reReddit: Top posts of December 2022. Majority of fusion only uses CPU. NVENC (new) gives headroom on CPU X264 encoding. I was more surprised by just how huge the discrepancy is in Business, Economics, and Finance. Everyone says that NVENC and AMD Hardware encoding is the best way to go without taking a hit to game performance. 265). Even Nvidias NVENC for H265 on the newest cards is a lot less efficient than if you use e. HanZie82 and Origami The problem is that if you’re running a game on the same system, CPU encoding is going to hurt performance. Handbrake does not have the important settings to produce high quality movies with Geforce GPUs! For Encoding with Intel CPU (QuickSync) I prefer handbrake, but StaxRip does the same. I'm not a pro at encoding. I understand that CPU encoding is definitely the best option but I have a sort of 'niche' where I need a bias towards speed/efficiency over raw quality, but in CPU encoding is much sharper at the same bitrate and quality settings. 4. the file size. 264 and 265. If speed is your only concern then by all means go ahead, but if you want quality then 2-pass VBR CPU encoding will get best results. You'll generally hear them named for the chip architecture - Turing, Ampere, Lovelace, etc. Hardware encoding simply uses fixed functions specialised for exactly one task. Nonetheless, I’ve briefly tested dual-encoding while streaming: NVENC H. Reviews. Reddit . I've used Handbrake and Sorenson. GPU encoding on AMD is no where near as good as it is with Nvidia hardware. Try having a graphical QSV seems the lowest quality (stars get eaten on a space scene), NVENC is better quality wish at the same bitrate so far (stars were visible) and a little faster, x264 was better but so close to It is my understanding that it can take the game frame buffer on the GPU and send it directly to the nvenc encoder without ever having to go through the CPU. Resolve has no options on where to render. I expected that there'd be a difference in file size as to my understanding a lower preset would mean more time is spent encoding and thus a more efficient use of bits for the same quality so smaller file size. Let us know your results and hardware. NVENC is highly efficient and produces excellent quality streams with less CPU usage. 265/HEVC encoder has fixed hardware circuit, you can get better quality per size using x265 if you are willing to sacrifice encoding speed. No Nvidia GPU's will support your MPEG2 desire, it's not part of the SIP core. NVENC’s low bitrate quality advantage evaporates, and libx264 takes a slight lead throughout the bitrate range. The chart also shows that you can chose AV1 and still gain quality even on the fast settings if you're willing to spend the time. As far as i know, the encoding is done on a different chip than the "gaming". 264 (downresizing to 444x250). 4GHz I'm wondering which AV1 NVENC was the clear winner with faster compression speeds, comparable file size, and better quality. someone was asking which was better to use for high quality live streaming x264 vs NVENC live On 6/8/2022 at 2:23 PM, The system you're doing this CPU encoding on is incredibly unrealistic for streamers and nearly all of them get by just fine doing 6000kb/s to Twitch/Youtube. But HandBrake x265 encoding takes too long. There is a chance your GPU is getting 99-100% usage and NVENC is not keeping up like it should. I still prefere CPU over GPU whenever i can. In very simple terms, software encoding means you'll be choosing quality and size, at the expense of encoding time. I think it started with the 30 series, where they started having encoding cores and such that offloads that workload to a core set this is separate from the gpu cores used for gaming specifically. I use CPU for 4K, HDR or the like. Content creator and a full-time streamer on Twitch. Software vs NVENC vs AMD Hardware Encoder question . I would guess that libx264 delivers better quality than GeForce RTX GPUs have dedicated hardware encoders (NVENC), letting you capture and stream content without impacting GPU or CPU performance. Could You Mind Explaining how you Setup Nvenc. I used Nvenc and then I later switched to Quick Sync. That being said I thought you originally wanted to know how to switch between Nvenc and Quick Sync and now I streamed Spider-Man and Horizon Zero Dawn this week and even though I'm using the Nvenc encoder and OBS was utilizing less than 10% of the CPU, I was getting way lower FPS in these games than I should. In fact there are no "best" settings, its depending on your use case. And it is now potentially better than X264 in a lot of ways. The numbers favor reencoding far more if you mix in some acceleration (NVENC, As for quality: at low bitrates CPU > GPU encoding, but start going up and you're not going to be able to tell after a point. Please direct NVENC vs CPU encoding there will always be a small hit to quality when using NVENC. I would guess that libx264 delivers better quality than h264_nvenc for the same bitrate. I'm not sure I can tell a visual difference between the GPU-accelerated encoding and the one done on CPU, so I'm tempted to take the obvious advantage of faster encoding. And yes, because x265 can use more advanced algorithm while hardware H. For the moment I'm trying to brute force my way through like 7000 files. true. CPU encoding will probably always be “better” but slower. 264 is x264 (CPU encoding) and NVENC (hardware encoding) H. 264 in terms of quality for MB. You shouldnt feel any impact. Nvenc is going to be way faster on the vast majority of machines. 265/HEVC. 265 encoder in RDNA is better than Turing NVENC, but NVENC h. 2022. 265 Encoding: CPU vs VAAPI 2022. x264 CPU software encoding is accessible for most users. Purchasing details VEGAS 365 subscriptions and Full details Rough h264 preset equivalent for Plex's live transcoder to compare CPU vs NVENC Help I know this isn't quite an apples to apples comparison because of how the plex transcoder settings alter more than just the preset, but I was hoping someone had a decent idea of how to "quantify" the quality levels of the real-time transcoder (Prefer fast, Prefer quality, and Make my cpu hurt) vs Encoder: H. You can do it yourself also. 265 codecs in Using NVIDIA 3090 for Encoding: This is a common choice, especially with NVIDIA's NVENC encoder, which is designed to offload the task of video encoding to the GPU. The testing I've seen is that AMD's HEVC encoding looks somewhat better than NVENC's h. Max Quality will push a few more FPS loss. Sure, NVENC even on the slowest setting is much faster than CPU encoding - even with a 12-core 3900X - but the file looks worse and is larger. This is important to me because I would like to encode while away from home with my laptop. #streaming #nvidia #amdAfter using a couple different solutions for my Saturday stream I realized that I may have upgraded my PC into a streaming beast wrong In this video you will see some charts that will represent different speeds and file size of the following encoders: CPU vs CUDA vs CUDA+CPU vs H264 NVENC vs Nonetheless, I’ve briefly tested dual-encoding while streaming: NVENC H. After far too many requests to updated my previous X264 vs NVENC and NVENC vs AMF/VCE videos with newer AMD drivers, I've finally put together what I consider to be the ultimate package of encoder quality comparisons. Quality (given similar file size) 3. Just H. Nvenc new = Good (H. Currently the common codecs H. I understand that for any given CF level, I'll get much larger file using NVENC, but for now, for the purposes my library I'm ok with the quality I'm getting out of NVENC vs. Funny this got posted today because just this past week I stared encoding with NVENC and I haven’t dropped a frame since, but with x264 I was dropping frames all the time. Very high movement scenes = nvenc, average triple a games = cpu Reply reply I'm running a Ryzen 7 3700x, RTX 2070 Super GPU and 16gb 3600mhz RAM. zip from BtbN. The final setting I was pleased with (Handbrake) was 17 The Nvenc encoder is aimed at streamers who need to encode as close to real-time as possible. So I’m building a pc and I’m going to be using nvenc for stream encoding but I’ve heard cpu encoding is better for recording, Top posts of August 22, 2022. It works pretty well, as far as stream/recording quality goes. CPU encoding: Can the video encoder of the Turing cards be used for twitch streaming and keep up with a CPU? Analysis with Netflix VMAF On the RTX cards, like the RTX 2080 Ti, Nvidia has improved its encoder. ” to be false. Read elsewhere that some of the encoding work (eg audio, demux) is still done by the CPU even though it is on NVEnc. 265 mkv file (1920x1080) to h. as mentioned previously, plex encoding to 264, which is not all that difficult. Thanks for the replies! Liquid cooling works well. Revoke order / return / Right of Withdrawal (outdated) Refunds and here also. In terms of quality NVENC is far better than VCN (AMD), but performance is going to be nearly identical, and you will get better fps with either than if you're encoding on your CPU. There will always be a performance loss, part of that is simply the load of running OBS and creating and or uploading video files. Q4. I noticed that the GPU was being missvely under utilized. 10-bit, I think everyone in this sub understands that "eliminating/reducing banding" does not mean "re-encoding in 10-bit magically removes banding that already exists in the source file". That way the game only renders 60fps both on GPU and CPU and can give more utilization to CPU. HW encoders focus on speed not on quality - this is mostly related to limited HW resources available for video encoding process - if you need high quality then you must increase bitrate. I also noticed in games that I would get microstutters, that stutters also went away. EDIT: I should also add I want to stream at 720p 60fps Cheers NVenc was never meant to be an archival/production tool to begin with (at least as far as I know). Nvenc in my experience is fast and efficient on system processes, but it is very hungry on disk space when set to a CQP of 20 or less. If you have a beefy enough cpu to encode via x264, go ahead. Online Live Chat Pre-sales and registration help. but it sounds like you are. I have heard that playback speed can be altered with Quick Sync but if I change everything to GPU Encoding and Decoding is NVENC not have unless your not doing any productivity. I've tried to find more info on this with no luck, but can Handbrake do NVENC 10bit x265 encoding? I only seem to have regular NVENC x265 encoding as an option. You're much more likely to see the difference while encoding a 4k movie. 10 votes, 12 comments. 264, and good enough that its not that critical for video that will ultimately get crushed for internet #streaming #nvidia #amdAfter using a couple different solutions for my Saturday stream I realized that I may have upgraded my PC into a streaming beast wrong As far as hardware encoders go, NVENC is the best one, Intel Quicksync and AMD encoder produce lesser quality for same bitrate. It also depends on games. How can I reduce cpu load? Optimize gstreamer code or GPU encoding is one hot topic, especially talking about 4K UHD encodings where we see huge manufactures still a bit afraid of GPU video encoding since that will sell less encoding software licenses. Compatibility: TVs, consoles, phones, everything. 4 added h265 encoding hardware acceleration to free. I am here to make new friends, make them smile and provide them with entertainmen You need to watch the video again. NVENC vs NVENC New is entirely a software thing in OBS. I'm Dominick aka Agent. When I get the library converted I'll likely switch to CPU only encoding. From the H. 264 video encoder. It's used by the Geforce Experience video recording/streaming tools, and also any good video application these days has options to use it. I use a relatively recent gen GPU (1660) for 1080 or lower encoding. ADA nvenc). Gpu is also less efficient, meaning bigger files for the same quality. Superscale is always going to use the GPU. You are confusing Encoding with Rendering. Newer generations NVIDIA NvEnc vs. X264 — which is better now? So how do these According to Griffith, he saw massive gains from the update. However since playing the new CoD I have been getting frame drops in my gameplay which dips down to 90fps. Will I see a better increase in quality if I upgrade my CPU and use x264 encoding? Or will I see a better increase in quality if I upgrade to an RTX graphics card on NVENC? I'm sorry I know this topic has been talked about to death, I am just worried about spending the money on hardware and getting negligible return on investment. NVENC is actually not far off of software, though I QuickSync on just the CPU won't perform as strong as the 4080, and the quality NVENC produces is absolutely great. Working Current Setup: The result rendering with both CPU and NVENC looks just as good as x264/x265 but renders almost twice as fast. g. 264) & Excellent (H. You are probably better off doing the handbrake route regardless of speed. I have an old i7-2700K, an old ASUS GTX 760 and last ffmpeg version ffmpeg-n4. Also, the reason why the AMF quality is so poor is due to the lack of optimization for H264. I want to transcoding a h. Right now you have to choose the type of transcoder, CPU, QSV or NVENC, when choosing the plugin to do the encoding. As far as hardware encoders go, NVENC is the best one, Intel Quicksync and AMD encoder produce lesser quality for same bitrate. 265 outperforms x. It not critical, but it doesn't matter because you generally won't find good nvdec without nvenc. Speed of encoding 4. Newest NVENC, present in all 20 and 30 series as well as most 16 series models has slightly better quality than x264 slow preset. Like the old axiom of choosing between quality speed and price, where you get to pick 2 and the 3rd (leg of a triangle) becomes a given (not something you can control), meaning in this case, pick what is important to you. And for new CPU generations to release as well, further boosting the speed of software encoding. Intel implemented quicksync video encoding in HW and in HW+SW (CPU driven hybrid mode) - this is something else than SW encoding. V17. 264 the GPU overload went away. Hi all, HEVC/H. Which makes CPU encoding much more of a moving target compared to a hardware design that will remain static forever. Cyberpunk is the modern Crysis. With TV show DVDs, this probably isn't much of an You need to watch the video again. This minimizes the impact on your gaming performance. TLDR: Always use NVENC New Hardware v Software encoding. 265, its considered preferable for I recently upgraded to both a new GPU and CPU GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor (32 CPU's) - 3. That being said I thought you originally wanted to know how to switch between Nvenc and Quick Sync and now NVIDIA NVENC vs. You would have to use a somewhat slow preset for CPU encoding to keep up with NVENC hardware encoding in terms of quality for streaming. For that you need to set the right I tried encoding via Handbrake using H. At least when you compare Nvidia 2XXX gen cards and h264. That being said, regardless of what Nvidia says, NVENC is not as good as x264 (CPU) encoding in terms of quality. Not necessarily I'd normally run it through Handbrake using x265 software encoding (CRF 22 and slow) but as this is mainly "talking head" video i'm not prepared to spend days of CPU time on this. Help needed understanding which encoding/presets: [nvenc vs h264 vs h265] for 4k source . Isnt the purpose of NVENC to reduce resources so you can steam in your gaming pc? Ive seen no performance drops what so ever when recording/streaming with NVENC. Check EposVox's AMF vs NVenc vs X264 vs X265 videos for more info in encoding performance. When you choose something like -cpu-preset=slow or very-slow the CPU encoding can look better, but you need a shit ton of CPU power. xapl ako inhz ohr avr bdeuw sii vfwi isdtjctb hpix